How two of Saturn’s moons were formed

blogadmin - Tuesday, 9 November 2010 08:57

Read more: space.newscientist.com An animation shows how Saturn’s moons Pan and Atlas grew by sweeping up particles from Saturn’s rings.

This video is modeled in the classic tradition of PT Barnum, offering a collection of oddities for your viewing pleasure. So enter the Curiosity Shop for a compilation of facts and beautiful moon images taken by the Cassini spacecraft in orbit around Saturn since 2004, set to Edvard Grieg’s Piano Concerto in A Minor, Op. 16 II. Adagio. This video is produced in honor of the recent Cassini Spacecraft Mission extension through September 2017. Take a gander at Gigantic Titan to your left. Feel free to ogle bright Enceladus to your right, reflecting close to 100 percent of the light that hits its surface. Don’t be afraid to eyeball Mimas and her craters. That’s what she’s there for! Saturn has the second most moons of planets in the solar system. Second, only to Jupiter. September 27th, 2010 marked the end of the Cassini Equinox Mission, which was over the last 2 years, and the beginning of the Cassini Solstice Mission. The extension to takes the spacecraft to September 2017, a couple months past Saturn’s Northern summer solstice in May 2017. Cassini has done a great deal to extend our knowledge of Saturn and it’s moons as well as delivered some of the most gorgeous photos taken in the Solar System; Photos of Saturn, Saturn’s rings and Saturn’s moons. This video pictures just a few of the many photos. Fact Sheet: Mimas Diameter: averages 396 km Orbital Radius: 185520 km Orbital Period: 22 hours and 37 minutes Mass: 37500000000 megatonnes Mimas and Rhea are widely considered

Tags: , , ,

53 Comments

  1. Commentsimagesk8r6969   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 9:01 am

    ufo at 0:47

  2. Commentsalphatelescopii   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 9:51 am

    good point.

  3. Commentsalphatelescopii   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 10:45 am

    i say ‘right on’ to you, and if you people want to make fun of me and Avalikia, I don’t care.

  4. Commentsdp100eboggan   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 11:21 am

    God ain’t a magician… he’s a scientist!

  5. Commentsspliz86   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 11:26 am

    Avalikia do u even know what a moon is

  6. CommentsAvalikia   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 11:37 am

    If you believe only in what can be proven, then by definition you don’t believe in anything. If something has been proven then it is known, not believed. And to disregard anything that isn’t proven is laughable. Until recently science couldn’t even explain how a bumblebee is able to fly, but they’ve been flying around for who knows how long anyway. But it’s nice to see you do accept respect, love, science, and reason despite the fact that all of the above are pointless if there is no God.

  7. Commentsyayarea41507   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 12:13 pm

    “it’s very sad for a person to feel like they have to live without belief.”

    live without belief??? hahaha

    I believe in what can be proven. I believe in respect, love, science & reason.

    the belief you speak of is blind faith with no evidence/proof

    to say it is sad for ppl to not completely buy your nonsense is pretty arrogant

  8. Commentsyayarea41507   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 1:08 pm

    hahahaha

    what evidence???

    BTW proof and evidence are the same thing

    if there was proof of god, then god would exist

    but by definition, with no proof, no god

    please tell me the full proof evidence I am disregarding???

    its unknown. thats what I’m saying

    but to say god exists with no proof is ridiculous

  9. CommentsAvalikia   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 1:27 pm

    Oh, so you refuse to believe in God because you have no proof? Well sorry, buddy, but it doesn’t work that way. If there was proof that God existed then you wouldn’t have to believe in Him because you’d know. But just because there’s no proof doesn’t mean there’s no evidence (there’s plenty), but if you’re too blind to see it yourself nothing I say will change your mind so I won’t bother. If disregarding that evidence helps you sleep at night, more power to you.

  10. Commentsyayarea41507   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 2:25 pm

    I did not tell you it happened by itself

    I’m telling you its unknown

    I’m telling you GOD/s & RELIGION ARE BS

    You’re telling me you know exactly how it started and developed WITH NO PROOF/EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER

    THATS WHAT I’M MAKING FUN OF

  11. CommentsAvalikia   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 3:13 pm

    You know, it’s very sad for a person to feel like they have to live without belief. I am truly religious, and I have no problem with evolution, any other natural law, or anything else discovered by science. The only difference is that I believe that something was guiding all this, while you believe that it happened by itself. And I’ll thank you to not tell me what I believe.

  12. Commentsyayarea41507   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 4:11 pm

    ya those ppl are retards

    intelligent design…
    creationism…
    blind faith…

    you use a key word: ‘BELIEVE’

    you have to have to disregard what’s known under natural laws to BELIEVE that bs

    its an insult to science & reason

    and yes if they were truly religious, they would have a problem with evolution b/c it goes against their unprovable nonsense

  13. CommentsAvalikia   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 4:20 pm

    Just because someone is religious doesn’t mean they have a problem with moons “evolving”. Some people believe in intelligent design, you know.

  14. Commentsphlexonance   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 4:32 pm

    french

  15. Commentsyikinchankawil   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 5:19 pm

    nice but… I think the accent of the guy it’s kindda odd… It´s he german dutch or what???

  16. Commentsyayarea41507   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 6:17 pm

    its hard not 2

  17. CommentsIchinin   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 6:22 pm

    Now, now, dont make fun of the slow people.

  18. CommentsAnarchemitis   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 7:05 pm

    Saturns rings look 2d because they are 1000′s of meters across, but only about 2 meters thick.

  19. Commentsintigfx   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 7:25 pm

    because usa isn’t the only country that has scientists

  20. Commentscrazy4candy2194   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 8:03 pm

    wow….that’s cool!

  21. CommentsMOOSIELYNN   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 8:50 pm

    SOO thats where UFOS come from

  22. Commentsburnmyburka   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 9:32 pm

    Great video. What purpose did it serve to have a narrator with such a thick accent?

  23. CommentsWiredAmerican   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 10:31 pm

    not and say we did. Good Idea, just think of the effort we would have to use if we really did.

  24. Commentscapsource1   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 10:37 pm

    What I’m amazed at is just simply how do they just find — how do they learn and figure these things out. think about it. It’s billions of ‘miles’ away and they talk as its just a few thousand miles away. I’m just amazed how they figure this out. Genius pure and simple.

  25. CommentsTheTallestTree   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 10:54 pm

    Let’s not and say we did….

    Seriously, neat & interesting video!

  26. CommentsEziekielNightwind   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 11:29 pm

    @ku62jo62 Our moon is called Luna, our planet is Earth, our star is Sol.

  27. Commentsdavothebum2201   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 11:46 pm

    0:01

  28. CommentsSpaceRip   |  Tuesday, 09 November 2010 at 11:59 pm

    @MazeleyFanClub You are partially right. The dark dust was mostly blown off of another moon, but the reason why it has the dark light look is because, one side is heated more by the sun making all of the light material (ice) on that side to sublimate over to the other side, making the dark side even darker and separating the two materials to opposite sides. This is from NASA/JPL

  29. Commentsmatatoe   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 12:46 am

    …who wants go to the mars rigth now??
    with a joint ,oohh yeahh…

  30. CommentsBigManInCanada   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 1:05 am

    @ku62jo62 Boot eye dun wahn tew yoose meye remane eeng brane sells

  31. Commentsryancolemanstudios   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 1:11 am

    @vxMarksmanxv
    I think Mimas looks cooler.

  32. Commentsku62jo62   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 1:24 am

    how come all the other planets moons have awesome names (e.g. enceladus, hyperion, titan, etc.) but ours is just “the moon”. seems a little smug and lacking in the creativity department.

  33. CommentsvxMarksmanxv   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 1:52 am

    Is it just me, or does the Odysseus crater on Tethys make it look kind of like the Death Star?

  34. CommentsHarryPotterObsessed7   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 2:38 am

    Atlas <3 My favorite satellite in all of the solar system!

  35. CommentsAdj19888   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 3:20 am

    @LonexX18 well said , peace bro

  36. Commentsrumrunner777   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 3:45 am

    Atlas is cool!

  37. CommentsLonexX18   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 3:46 am

    @Adj19888

    I love all of them aswell man, if they made a movie about Saturn’s Moon I’d even go to the cinema. Space is amazing and space is our future.Keep looking up.

  38. CommentsAdj19888   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 3:55 am

    @LonexX18 man i love them what can i do

  39. CommentsJigiligy   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 4:37 am

    Didnt know pandora really existed. Though it looks ugly here

  40. CommentsBludgeonier   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 4:37 am

    @sakuyarules It is great to see people who do research! Glad that you pointed out how Cruithne dosn’t fit the usual definition of a moon. More info is always a good thing, and not easy to get when there is a charicter limit. :)

  41. Commentssakuyarules   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 4:40 am

    @Bludgeonier I see. I was simply copying what was written in wikipedia. When you mentioned a second moon I was intrigued, after seeing that wiki article (I know that’s not nearly enough research, but meh), just didn’t want everyone to get the wrong idea is all.

  42. CommentsLonexX18   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 5:15 am

    @Adj19888

    I know but why should the mention two of the smallest moons? There’s hardly enough time for the big ones and you are upset about the fact that they didn’t mention two really small ones? come on man

  43. CommentsBludgeonier   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 5:53 am

    @sakuyarules True that Cruithne fits the definition of a near Earth astroid because it follows closely a solar orbit which varies between 362 and 371 days, but durring a long term observation in 1995-7 it was found to also interact with and orbit Earth during the oscilation. Meaning it does not fit in either a solar orbit or an Earth orbit, but does both. It is in limbo between beeing a true moon and being a loose rock. Only future generations will see it be in one catagory or the other.

  44. CommentsBlackThoven   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 6:12 am

    Space is too amazing! It’s complexity is astonishing at the least

  45. CommentsStrideo1   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 7:05 am

    @firehop3 Out to lunch.

  46. Commentsquiet777riot   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 7:07 am

    This video cured my ADHD, and now I am really wondering why the photo of Ti…LOOK A CROP CIRCLE!!! What was I saying? Oh yeah. Why is the photo of Titan so blurry? Is there something there we’re not supposed to see NASA? Hmmm…

  47. Commentsquiet777riot   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 7:54 am

    B.T. Barnum is awesome. That is all.

  48. CommentsAdj19888   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 8:08 am

    @LonexX18 those are moons also

  49. CommentsXyleJKH   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 8:15 am

    @SpaceRip potatoes are good… got some irish in your blood? LoL

  50. Commentsitsasin1969   |  Wednesday, 10 November 2010 at 8:58 am

    3 thumbs down? Really?

  51. Commentscfnm secret   |  Thursday, 11 November 2010 at 6:37 pm

    The response to my inquiries have been very easy to digest thanks to this blog. It is surely worth reading to aid relieve the stress I have been encountering. I recommend this for an award.

  52. Commentsfitness resource   |  Saturday, 13 November 2010 at 12:19 am

    It is awesome to come across something worth looking at. Seems like everybody is starting a blog and tossing up whatever jumps into their mind. Most of the time it does not make sense. I am pleased to see that is not the case here.

  53. CommentsYour Free Articles Resources|Submit Your Articles - www.equinoxpub.us   |  Sunday, 14 November 2010 at 12:22 am

    Another Title…

    I saw this really good post today….

Leave a Reply






Powered by Yahoo! Answers